ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 15 OLED - Revision history

Andrei.boiu: /* Durability and Repair-ability */

2022-04-25T07:39:18Z

Durability and Repair-ability

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 25 April 2022
Line 63:		Line 63:

	== Durability and Repair-ability ==		== Durability and Repair-ability ==
	~~Good plastic quality means that~~ case ~~cracks are less common than on~~ other ~~models~~ but the ~~model by itself~~ is not ~~immune~~. ~~Removable~~ and the ~~fixed drive bay are easy to access and~~ the case itself is ~~easy~~ to ~~disassemble due to obvious markings on the laptop's underside as well as masking black tape placed on screws~~. ~~Many generations (series) of~~ laptops, ~~such as~~ the ~~T60/T61 use~~ the ~~same easy~~ to ~~find screws~~, ~~trackpads and buttons, keyboards, cooling systems are interchangeable while screens, palmrests, bezels are specific to laptops sizes~~.		Despite the pro moniker, the laptop does not have a highly durable case or any other durability enhancement. The construction feels alight but the laptop is clearly not made to withstand abuse and falls more than typical models. The case flexes during typing on the center keys and the display can experience flexes when enough pressure is placed in the center area of the top case. The keyboard itself is not waterproof so any water that may drip into the computer will not be able to exit it without pooling. As with all modern, even slightly upmarket laptops, there is no way to secure the display to the bottom case, although the hinges seem to be able to maintain the laptop closed quite tightly, at least initially.

	~~The LCD screen's fluorescent backlight~~ is ~~easier~~ to ~~replace since there~~ is ~~plenty of space and a good design on the screen's casing and light dispersion system~~ to ~~accommodate newer and thinner lamps or thicker classic ones~~. ~~LCD screens~~ can be ~~inter-changed~~ to ~~suit a specific native resolution requirement if~~ the ~~proper original cabling is available~~. ~~Fans and~~ the ~~fan blades can be easily cleaned and bearings can be easily greased~~, ~~providing long service life since fan casing stud mountings can be pried open and placed back again~~.		Repair-ability is limited mostly by the amount of components that are directly soldered to the motherboard. As the RAM cannot be replaced, despite the typical durability of such components, it still means that any damage to it is much harder to mitigate. The bottom case has a cover that can be reasonably easy to unscrew, offering access to all internals for cleaning or replacement of the WiFi and SSD drive. Due to the way in which the laptop operate, you have to contend with quite frequent dust cleanings as the fans are on, sometimes, even during idle processing periods.

	== Greatest features & flaws ==		== Greatest features & flaws ==

Andrei.boiu at 10:41, 12 April 2022

2022-04-12T10:41:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 12 April 2022
Line 54:		Line 54:
	</div>		</div>
	\|style="vertical-align:top" \|		\|style="vertical-align:top" \|
	[[Image:~~IBM_T60~~.jpg\|~~IBM T60 14~~"]]		[[Image:ASUS_Vivobook_Pro_15_OLED.jpg\|ASUS Vivobook Pro OLED 15.6"]]
	\|}		\|}

Andrei.boiu at 10:27, 12 April 2022

2022-04-12T10:27:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 12 April 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|style="vertical-align:top" \|		\|style="vertical-align:top" \|
	<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;">		<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;">
	~~Asus~~ Vivobook Pro 15 OLED		ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 and 15 inch OLED models (2021)

	== Features ==		== Features ==

Andrei.boiu: Andrei.boiu moved page ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED to ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 15 OLED without leaving a redirect

2022-04-12T10:26:27Z

Andrei.boiu moved page ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED to ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 15 OLED without leaving a redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:26, 12 April 2022
(No difference)

Andrei.boiu: /* Review */

2022-04-12T10:25:42Z

Review

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 12 April 2022
Line 96:		Line 96:
	The storage selection is decent but it does not feature high performance SSDs but low-end PCIe NVME choices that are only slightly better than SATA models, being, again, far from the PRO moniker. It is true that affordable SSDs can be present on the lower end models, but the top of the line one should have a much better one. Just as important, 1TB SSDs seem quite on the low side for video editors, the 2TB choice should have been present.		The storage selection is decent but it does not feature high performance SSDs but low-end PCIe NVME choices that are only slightly better than SATA models, being, again, far from the PRO moniker. It is true that affordable SSDs can be present on the lower end models, but the top of the line one should have a much better one. Just as important, 1TB SSDs seem quite on the low side for video editors, the 2TB choice should have been present.

	The chassis seems reasonably well made but it does not have a frame stiff enough to improve survivability. Also, the lower case bends slightly when using the keyboard, making the typing experience not that pleasant, despite the overall good performance of the keyboard itself. The trackpad feels smooth and sensitive, being comfortable to use and generally precise enough. As is standard with most laptops, it is large and support multiple gestures. The sound system is decent, but falls short of expectations for a Harman/Kardon tuneup. The speakers sound reasonably fine but there is a clear lack of space and bass output while general reproduction does not shine in any other way. Microphone input is somewhat better than on some laptops, but still far behind even mid-range phones of 5 years ago. The integrated camera video quality is very poor, not having full HD resolution and being far from even cheap front smartphone cameras.		The chassis seems reasonably well made but it does not have a frame stiff enough to improve survivability. Also, the lower case bends slightly when using the keyboard, making the typing experience not that pleasant, despite the overall good performance of the keyboard itself. The trackpad feels smooth and sensitive, being comfortable to use and generally precise enough. As is standard with most laptops, it is large and support multiple gestures.

			The sound system is decent, but falls short of expectations for a Harman/Kardon tuneup. The speakers sound reasonably fine but there is a clear lack of space and bass output while general reproduction does not shine in any other way. Microphone input is somewhat better than on some laptops, but still far behind even mid-range phones of 5 years ago. The integrated camera video quality is very poor, not having full HD resolution and being far from even cheap front smartphone cameras.

	The port selection seems very poor for a pro laptop. There is no reasonable explanation for designing the laptop with 2 USB2 ports and a single TYPE A USB3 port. The USB2 ports have a too poor performance to be used in most cases and especially so on a laptop designed for work. Even 8 years ago some 12 inch laptops had 2 USB 3 ports, so there is no excuse for delivering a laptop with a single USB3 Type A port.		The port selection seems very poor for a pro laptop. There is no reasonable explanation for designing the laptop with 2 USB2 ports and a single TYPE A USB3 port. The USB2 ports have a too poor performance to be used in most cases and especially so on a laptop designed for work. Even 8 years ago some 12 inch laptops had 2 USB 3 ports, so there is no excuse for delivering a laptop with a single USB3 Type A port.

Andrei.boiu: /* Review */

2022-04-12T10:24:59Z

Review

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 12 April 2022
Line 90:		Line 90:
	The limited RAM configuration choices are a major nuisance. The 8GB configuration is seriously limiting even in Windows 10 and Windows 11 does not seem to improve the situation much. Using large applications can easily get close to even the largest 16GB configuration. There seems to be no reason to forego even the availability of a single RAM upgrade slot in the laptop, as previously even cheap models had this choice. Being left with a single configuration possibility vastly reduces the laptop's main life potential as well as its re-usability, being wasteful on resources.		The limited RAM configuration choices are a major nuisance. The 8GB configuration is seriously limiting even in Windows 10 and Windows 11 does not seem to improve the situation much. Using large applications can easily get close to even the largest 16GB configuration. There seems to be no reason to forego even the availability of a single RAM upgrade slot in the laptop, as previously even cheap models had this choice. Being left with a single configuration possibility vastly reduces the laptop's main life potential as well as its re-usability, being wasteful on resources.

	The integrated graphics performance is poor, whether you have an AMD or Intel configuration. It seems almost pointless that such fast CPUs are coupled with abysmal graphics chipsets. As it seems, the pro lineup should have been supplied only with dedicated graphics capabilities. Even the graphics chipset lineup seems inadequate as highly performing video cards from AMD and Nvidia are not included either, making the top of the line models still short on GPU performance.		The integrated graphics performance is poor, whether you have an AMD or Intel configuration. It seems almost pointless that such fast CPUs are coupled with abysmal graphics chipsets. As it seems, the pro lineup should have been supplied only with dedicated graphics capabilities. Even the graphics chipset lineup seems inadequate as highly performing video cards from AMD and Nvidia are not included either, making the top of the line models still short on GPU performance. Decent, albeit somewhat noisy cooling, noticeable even in some idle load cases, maintains predictable performance and a comfortably low surface temperature.

	<youtube width="500" height="281">1b619GkkwBo</youtube>		<youtube width="500" height="281">1b619GkkwBo</youtube>
Line 96:		Line 96:
	The storage selection is decent but it does not feature high performance SSDs but low-end PCIe NVME choices that are only slightly better than SATA models, being, again, far from the PRO moniker. It is true that affordable SSDs can be present on the lower end models, but the top of the line one should have a much better one. Just as important, 1TB SSDs seem quite on the low side for video editors, the 2TB choice should have been present.		The storage selection is decent but it does not feature high performance SSDs but low-end PCIe NVME choices that are only slightly better than SATA models, being, again, far from the PRO moniker. It is true that affordable SSDs can be present on the lower end models, but the top of the line one should have a much better one. Just as important, 1TB SSDs seem quite on the low side for video editors, the 2TB choice should have been present.

	The chassis seems reasonably well made but it does not have a frame stiff enough to improve survivability. Also, the lower case bends slightly when using the keyboard, making the typing experience not that pleasant, despite the overall good performance of the keyboard itself. The trackpad feels smooth and sensitive, being comfortable to use and generally precise enough. As is standard with most laptops, it is large and support multiple gestures.		The chassis seems reasonably well made but it does not have a frame stiff enough to improve survivability. Also, the lower case bends slightly when using the keyboard, making the typing experience not that pleasant, despite the overall good performance of the keyboard itself. The trackpad feels smooth and sensitive, being comfortable to use and generally precise enough. As is standard with most laptops, it is large and support multiple gestures. The sound system is decent, but falls short of expectations for a Harman/Kardon tuneup. The speakers sound reasonably fine but there is a clear lack of space and bass output while general reproduction does not shine in any other way. Microphone input is somewhat better than on some laptops, but still far behind even mid-range phones of 5 years ago. The integrated camera video quality is very poor, not having full HD resolution and being far from even cheap front smartphone cameras.

	The port selection seems very poor for a pro laptop. There is no reasonable explanation for designing the laptop with 2 USB2 ports and a single TYPE A USB3 port. The USB2 ports have a too poor performance to be used in most cases and especially so on a laptop designed for work. Even 8 years ago some 12 inch laptops had 2 USB 3 ports, so there is no excuse for delivering a laptop with a single USB3 Type A port.		The port selection seems very poor for a pro laptop. There is no reasonable explanation for designing the laptop with 2 USB2 ports and a single TYPE A USB3 port. The USB2 ports have a too poor performance to be used in most cases and especially so on a laptop designed for work. Even 8 years ago some 12 inch laptops had 2 USB 3 ports, so there is no excuse for delivering a laptop with a single USB3 Type A port.

Andrei.boiu at 10:19, 12 April 2022

2022-04-12T10:19:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 12 April 2022
Line 89:		Line 89:

	The limited RAM configuration choices are a major nuisance. The 8GB configuration is seriously limiting even in Windows 10 and Windows 11 does not seem to improve the situation much. Using large applications can easily get close to even the largest 16GB configuration. There seems to be no reason to forego even the availability of a single RAM upgrade slot in the laptop, as previously even cheap models had this choice. Being left with a single configuration possibility vastly reduces the laptop's main life potential as well as its re-usability, being wasteful on resources.		The limited RAM configuration choices are a major nuisance. The 8GB configuration is seriously limiting even in Windows 10 and Windows 11 does not seem to improve the situation much. Using large applications can easily get close to even the largest 16GB configuration. There seems to be no reason to forego even the availability of a single RAM upgrade slot in the laptop, as previously even cheap models had this choice. Being left with a single configuration possibility vastly reduces the laptop's main life potential as well as its re-usability, being wasteful on resources.

			The integrated graphics performance is poor, whether you have an AMD or Intel configuration. It seems almost pointless that such fast CPUs are coupled with abysmal graphics chipsets. As it seems, the pro lineup should have been supplied only with dedicated graphics capabilities. Even the graphics chipset lineup seems inadequate as highly performing video cards from AMD and Nvidia are not included either, making the top of the line models still short on GPU performance.

	<youtube width="500" height="281">1b619GkkwBo</youtube>		<youtube width="500" height="281">1b619GkkwBo</youtube>

	The integrated graphics performance is poor, whether you have an AMD or Intel configuration. It seems almost pointless that such fast CPUs are coupled with abysmal graphics chipsets. As it seems, the pro lineup should have been supplied only with dedicated graphics capabilities. Even the graphics chipset lineup seems inadequate as highly performing video cards from AMD and Nvidia are not included either, making the top of the line models still short on GPU performance.		The storage selection is decent but it does not feature high performance SSDs but low-end PCIe NVME choices that are only slightly better than SATA models, being, again, far from the PRO moniker. It is true that affordable SSDs can be present on the lower end models, but the top of the line one should have a much better one. Just as important, 1TB SSDs seem quite on the low side for video editors, the 2TB choice should have been present.

	The storage selection is decent but it does not feature high performance SSDs but low-end PCIe NVME choices that are only slightly better than SATA models, being, again, far from the PRO moniker. It is true that affordable SSDs can be present on the lower end models, but the top of the line one should have a much better one. Just as important, 1TB SSDs seem quite on the low side for video editors, the 2TB choice should have been present~~.omes obvious on this last fully IBM developed laptop~~.

	The chassis seems reasonably well made but it does not have a frame stiff enough to improve survivability. Also, the lower case bends slightly when using the keyboard, making the typing experience not that pleasant, despite the overall good performance of the keyboard itself. The trackpad feels smooth and sensitive, being comfortable to use and generally precise enough. As is standard with most laptops, it is large and support multiple gestures.		The chassis seems reasonably well made but it does not have a frame stiff enough to improve survivability. Also, the lower case bends slightly when using the keyboard, making the typing experience not that pleasant, despite the overall good performance of the keyboard itself. The trackpad feels smooth and sensitive, being comfortable to use and generally precise enough. As is standard with most laptops, it is large and support multiple gestures.

Andrei.boiu at 10:17, 12 April 2022

2022-04-12T10:17:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 12 April 2022
Line 89:		Line 89:

	The limited RAM configuration choices are a major nuisance. The 8GB configuration is seriously limiting even in Windows 10 and Windows 11 does not seem to improve the situation much. Using large applications can easily get close to even the largest 16GB configuration. There seems to be no reason to forego even the availability of a single RAM upgrade slot in the laptop, as previously even cheap models had this choice. Being left with a single configuration possibility vastly reduces the laptop's main life potential as well as its re-usability, being wasteful on resources.		The limited RAM configuration choices are a major nuisance. The 8GB configuration is seriously limiting even in Windows 10 and Windows 11 does not seem to improve the situation much. Using large applications can easily get close to even the largest 16GB configuration. There seems to be no reason to forego even the availability of a single RAM upgrade slot in the laptop, as previously even cheap models had this choice. Being left with a single configuration possibility vastly reduces the laptop's main life potential as well as its re-usability, being wasteful on resources.

			<youtube width="500" height="281">1b619GkkwBo</youtube>

	The integrated graphics performance is poor, whether you have an AMD or Intel configuration. It seems almost pointless that such fast CPUs are coupled with abysmal graphics chipsets. As it seems, the pro lineup should have been supplied only with dedicated graphics capabilities. Even the graphics chipset lineup seems inadequate as highly performing video cards from AMD and Nvidia are not included either, making the top of the line models still short on GPU performance.		The integrated graphics performance is poor, whether you have an AMD or Intel configuration. It seems almost pointless that such fast CPUs are coupled with abysmal graphics chipsets. As it seems, the pro lineup should have been supplied only with dedicated graphics capabilities. Even the graphics chipset lineup seems inadequate as highly performing video cards from AMD and Nvidia are not included either, making the top of the line models still short on GPU performance.

Andrei.boiu: /* Review */

2022-04-12T10:15:45Z

Review

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 12 April 2022
Line 82:		Line 82:

	== Review ==		== Review ==
	A mainstream, ~~quite slim, moderately powerful, business~~ laptop, released in ~~2006~~. ~~It had an average mix of performance parts~~, ~~with a better than average CPU (when using~~ the ~~Core 2 Duo option)~~ but a ~~somewhat lacking graphics module~~ and ~~more fragmentation, due to the similarly equipped Radeon X1300 and X1400 graphics chipsets and the lackluster Intel GPU also available for ordering~~.		A mainstream, laptop catering to professional users, released in 2021. The major highlight is the worldwide highly acclaimed OLED screens from Samsung, the AMOLED lineup. This offers unprecedented visual comfort at an affordable price. The configuration options are reasonable but the laptop does not respect the "PRO" moniker, having a mediocre 15 inch screen and no possibility of upgrading RAM.

	The ~~platform~~ is ~~centered on Windows XP compatibility~~, with ~~DDR2 RAM and SATA but not yet a webcam~~, ~~even if these features were available~~ at that ~~time on other manufacturers' laptops. Overall~~, ~~there are very small changes between T43 and~~ the ~~previous T60 model in terms~~ of graphics ~~performance although some chassis changes are highly welcome. The trackpad is strongly improved~~, ~~being~~ more ~~confortable and more reliable due to better buttons and sensitivity~~. ~~Cooling is the most severe improvement, having an estimated 50~~-~~75% improvement~~ in ~~capacity and reduced noise at various fan speeds~~, ~~mostly due to~~ the ~~requirement~~ of ~~handling faster CPUs~~. to ~~feel very dated~~ and slightly ~~underpowered~~.		The OLED screen is the major highlight of this laptop lineup. It offers excellent contrast ratio that are practically infinite (1 million to 1), compared with LCD screens that only reach, at most around a couple of thousands to 1 ratios. This means that black and dim colours are presented realistically, even better than in the case of old CRT screens that have been highly praised by graphics designers, more than a decade ago. The 100% DCI-P3 certifications offers even more confidence in any graphics editing scenario, which simply highlights in the best way the suitability of these laptops. The only minor complaint to have is that the 15 inch models have a poorer (standard) refresh rate and lower resolution, which seems slightly unsuitable for 15 inch screens. Keep in mind that the screen may be slightly unstable in brightness at low light levels and this is not a defect.

	The ~~LCD screen has slightly improved specifications in terms~~ of ~~response time, contrast. Higher resolution~~ models ~~are reasonably close in terms~~ of ~~performance compared with standard resolution ones, limiting~~ the ~~drawbacks compared with~~ the ~~T43 series~~. ~~The choice~~ of ~~resolution depends mostly on~~ the ~~target OS~~, ~~with the 1024x768 resolution better suited for Windows XP while~~ the ~~1400x1050 resolution is better suited for Windows Vista and Seven. The 1600x1200 resolution is suited~~ only ~~for specific use cases~~. ~~Screens can be easily replaced between similar models but~~ the ~~connector must also be replaced if using different T6x series displays. The widescreen variant~~ is ~~somewhat useless due to the lackluster~~ graphics ~~chipsets available~~ not ~~allowing good enough native resolution performance so they should be avoided~~. ~~Also, some XP era games might not run or look great on widescreen displays~~. On the ~~other side,~~ the ~~widescreen model has better audio capabilities due to a different speaker placement~~, ~~on the top of the chassis, near the screen assembly~~.		The choice of CPUs make the lineup heavily skewed towards AMD models and does not fully include top of the line models from either manufacturer (the HK Intel Series and HX AMD Series). These have the highest number of cores and performance. In terms of raw capability, the Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 configurations offer true desktop replacement performance, the only exceptions being overly demanding workloads. Unfortunately, the choice of video cards does not keep up well and is lacking even when an integrated graphics option is not used. Cooling also seems unoptimized for noise output. While the dual CPU fan configuration is highly effective in keeping the system cooled even when running at full load, it is very noisy and lowly kicks in even in idle states.

	~~It has~~ a ~~high performance CPU, especially in the Intel Core 2 Duo variant~~. The ~~Intel Core Duo Cpu~~ is ~~quite a mixed bag as it~~ does not ~~support 64bit operating systems and it is quite slower than~~ the ~~Intel Core 2 Duo CPU, and slightly sluggish in certain cases (lower cache and latency performance)~~. ~~This makes~~ the ~~Core Solo option entirely unacceptable~~. ~~The Intel video chipset is~~ a ~~very poor option~~ as ~~it does not support Hardware TnL or other capabilities, making it suitable for legacy gaming or application support. The CPU cooling is adequate for all CPU options. Higher performing~~ models ~~with ATI graphics require are only slightly noisier and warmer~~. ~~The keyboard is quite durable but slightly less stiff and~~ with a ~~noticeable poorer quality feel. The slow decline in build quality becomes obvious~~ on ~~this last fully IBM developed laptop~~.		The limited RAM configuration choices are a major nuisance. The 8GB configuration is seriously limiting even in Windows 10 and Windows 11 does not seem to improve the situation much. Using large applications can easily get close to even the largest 16GB configuration. There seems to be no reason to forego even the availability of a single RAM upgrade slot in the laptop, as previously even cheap models had this choice. Being left with a single configuration possibility vastly reduces the laptop's main life potential as well as its re-usability, being wasteful on resources.

	The ~~removable drive bay can house~~ an ~~optical drive~~ or ~~a hard drive~~, ~~if you can find a compatible caddy~~. ~~The rechargeable battery can be easily removed or replaced. The BIOS~~ and ~~timekeeping battery is a standard CR2032 3V button cell~~.		The integrated graphics performance is poor, whether you have an AMD or Intel configuration. It seems almost pointless that such fast CPUs are coupled with abysmal graphics chipsets. As it seems, the pro lineup should have been supplied only with dedicated graphics capabilities. Even the graphics chipset lineup seems inadequate as highly performing video cards from AMD and Nvidia are not included either, making the top of the line models still short on GPU performance.

	The ~~chasis was~~ slightly ~~larger~~ than the ~~T4x series but it is more rounded and even mor comfortable~~. ~~The laptop's case~~ is ~~slightly less durable than~~ the ~~T4x series~~, but ~~it holds up well to other durable laptops, while being lighter than~~ the ~~T4x series~~. ~~The display hinges are overly engineered~~, ~~with great durability. The integrated speakers are~~ quite ~~good, although their position~~, ~~size and technology is not~~ the ~~best~~.		The storage selection is decent but it does not feature high performance SSDs but low-end PCIe NVME choices that are only slightly better than SATA models, being, again, far from the PRO moniker. It is true that affordable SSDs can be present on the lower end models, but the top of the line one should have a much better one. Just as important, 1TB SSDs seem quite on the low side for video editors, the 2TB choice should have been present.omes obvious on this last fully IBM developed laptop.

	The ~~standard HDDs supplied by Western Digital are~~ reasonably ~~fast and quite silent~~. ~~The SATA drives offer a~~ good performance ~~boost compared with~~ the ~~T4x series PATA drives~~, ~~while also supporting exotic, very fast, modern SSDs~~. ~~No restriction~~ is ~~placed on HDD types. The only compatibility drawback~~ is ~~that only IBM branded or accepted wireless cards can be used~~.		The chassis seems reasonably well made but it does not have a frame stiff enough to improve survivability. Also, the lower case bends slightly when using the keyboard, making the typing experience not that pleasant, despite the overall good performance of the keyboard itself. The trackpad feels smooth and sensitive, being comfortable to use and generally precise enough. As is standard with most laptops, it is large and support multiple gestures.

	~~Software support~~ is ~~good~~ on ~~Windows XP but slightly~~ less ~~polished~~ for ~~Windows Seven~~. ~~This~~ is ~~somewhat obvious~~ as ~~drivers~~ are ~~actually released with full compatibility upto~~ Windows ~~Vista~~ and the ~~lackluster~~ Intel ~~video chipset is entirely unsuitable~~ for the ~~Windows 7 GUI acceleration requirements~~.		The port selection seems very poor for a pro laptop. There is no reasonable explanation for designing the laptop with 2 USB2 ports and a single TYPE A USB3 port. The USB2 ports have a too poor performance to be used in most cases and especially so on a laptop designed for work. Even 8 years ago some 12 inch laptops had 2 USB 3 ports, so there is no excuse for delivering a laptop with a single USB3 Type A port.

			The inclusion of a single USB3.2 Type C port is even less understandable, as the laptop has plenty of space for at least 2 such ports. Availability of a micro SD card reader is welcome, although it depends on your workflow if it is useful or not. The lack of USB Type C charging seems unpleasant, especially in the case of integrated graphics configurations that draw less current. Not having to carry a proprietary power adapter would have been a major usability advantage. Moreover, as USB3 Type C adapters get more common and higher power ratings are cheaply available, this decision seems less forward thinking as an USB Type C adapter can power a laptop, tablet or telephone easily and requires less space for travelers.

			The standard configuration that features a 60Wh battery seems small for 15 inch laptop models and the endurance of it is outright low even without integrated graphics as the laptop has issues reliably being used for more than 6 hours in typical pro editing applications, even discounting 3D design and video editing which are overly CPU intensive.

			Software support is somewhat good on Windows 10 and Windows 11 but graphics drivers seem to be quite incomplete in backward and forward compatibility, leading to cases when certain applications do crash or textures are missing. Most well known titles fare well but there are fringe cases that seem to manifest. While the AMD configuration options are plenty for graphics, Intel ones seem almost nonexistant, making an almost pointless purchase reason for this laptop configuration as it also performs poorer, generally, and the cost difference is not justifiable.

	{{footnotes\|		{{footnotes\|
	# There are no visual clues to differentiate between display types or graphics chipsets based on exterior appearance. However, the 15 inch can be easily noticed as they use a different, thicker, right screen hinge. Models with or without Bluetooth can be spotted if the screen assembly was not changed, due to the well known status bar light on the lower side of the screen.
	}}		}}

	[[Category:ASUS laptops]]		[[Category:ASUS laptops]]

Andrei.boiu: /* Greatest features & flaws */

2022-04-12T09:32:38Z

Greatest features & flaws

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 12 April 2022
Line 76:		Line 76:
	\| Great performance AMD CPU configuration \|\| Mediocre Intel CPU configuration performance		\| Great performance AMD CPU configuration \|\| Mediocre Intel CPU configuration performance
	\|-		\|-
	\| Comfortable keyboard, sensitive trackpad \|\| No upgradeable RAM		\| Comfortable keyboard, sensitive trackpad \|\| No upgradeable RAM, mediocre performance SSD installed
	\|-		\|-
	\| Great WiFi 6, decent microphone and speaker performance \|\| Noisy cooling even without dedicated graphics		\| Great WiFi 6, decent microphone and speaker performance \|\| Noisy cooling even without dedicated graphics