IBM Thinkpad T42 - Revision history

Andrei.boiu at 09:30, 23 September 2021

2021-09-23T09:30:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 23 September 2021
Line 91:		Line 91:
	}}		}}

	[[Category:IBM]]		[[Category:IBM laptops]]

Andrei.boiu at 22:12, 31 August 2021

2021-08-31T22:12:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 1 September 2021
Line 53:		Line 53:
	== Benchmarks ==		== Benchmarks ==

			== Durability and Repair-ability ==
			Good plastic quality means that case cracks are less common than on other models but the model by itself is not immune. Removable and fixed drive bay are easy to access and the case itself is easy to disassemble due to obvious markings on the laptop's underside as well as masking black tape placed on screws. Many generations (series) of laptops, such as the T40/T41/T42/T43 use the same, easy to find screws, trackpads and buttons, keyboards, cooling systems are interchangeable while screens, palmrests, bezels are specific to laptops sizes.

			The LCD screen's fluorescent backlight is somewhat hard to replace since screens are slim. LCD screens can be inter-changed to suit a specific native resolution requirement if the proper original cabling is available. Fans and the fan blades can be easily cleaned and bearings can be easily greased, providing long service life since fan casing stud mountings can be pried open and placed back again.

			== Greatest features & flaws ==
			{\| border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2
			\|- style="background:#efefef;"
			! Features !! Flaws
			\|-
			\| Very slim yet configurable laptop \|\| Same case as on Thinkpad T40/T41 models
			\|-
			\| Powerful ATI Radeon 9600 chipset \|\| Insufficient cooling, no DVI/HDMI output except on docking station
			\|-
			\| Durable, stiff keyboard \|\| Shorter life trackpoint buttons
			\|-
			\| Good, somewhat quiet cooling system \|\| Annoying IBM/Lenovo BIOS limitation of approved Wifi cards
			\|}

	== Review ==		== Review ==

Andrei.boiu at 16:03, 8 August 2021

2021-08-08T16:03:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 8 August 2021
Line 59:		Line 59:
	The LCD screen has quite good specifications but high resolution models are slightly dimmer overall and on the screen edges. Response time is very high on IPS screens, with lots of ghosting, making the laptop having this display suited only for office use. Also, due to the medium quality screen resizing, running 1024x768 or lower resolutions on 1400x1050 screens looks quite blurry. Screens can be easily replaced between similar models but the connector must also be replaced if using different T4x series screens.		The LCD screen has quite good specifications but high resolution models are slightly dimmer overall and on the screen edges. Response time is very high on IPS screens, with lots of ghosting, making the laptop having this display suited only for office use. Also, due to the medium quality screen resizing, running 1024x768 or lower resolutions on 1400x1050 screens looks quite blurry. Screens can be easily replaced between similar models but the connector must also be replaced if using different T4x series screens.

	It has a high performance CPU, if you avoid the rare and odd Banias model, with a mixed ~~peerformance~~ video chipset, especially for Radeon 7500. The CPU does not release too much heat compared with previous Pentium 4 models. Unfortunately, the higher performing models with ATI graphics require serious cooling, are noisier and operate warmer. The keyboard is durable and with good tactile feedback. The trackpad buttons are not very durable even if the trackpad itself is so. The trackpoint and keyboard are at the level of the classic, renowed IBM quality.		It has a high performance CPU, if you avoid the rare and odd Banias model, with a mixed performance video chipset, especially for Radeon 7500. The CPU does not release too much heat compared with previous Pentium 4 models. Unfortunately, the higher performing models with ATI graphics require serious cooling, are noisier and operate warmer. The keyboard is durable and with good tactile feedback. The trackpad buttons are not very durable even if the trackpad itself is so. The trackpoint and keyboard are at the level of the classic, renowed IBM quality.

	The removable drive bay can house an optical drive or a hard drive, if you can find a compatible caddy. was a very poor choice, since the belt driven disk rotation fails after many years, compatible belts being harder to find unreliable. The rechargeable battery can be easily removed or replaced. The BIOS and timekeeping battery is a standard CR2032 3V button cell.		The removable drive bay can house an optical drive or a hard drive, if you can find a compatible caddy. was a very poor choice, since the belt driven disk rotation fails after many years, compatible belts being harder to find unreliable. The rechargeable battery can be easily removed or replaced. The BIOS and timekeeping battery is a standard CR2032 3V button cell.
Line 65:		Line 65:
	The chasis was slim, light, very comfortable, even thinner than later IBM or Lenovo models. The laptop's case is very durable, but plastic can still crack due to age or shocks. The display hinges are overly engineered, eternal. The integrated speakers are quite good, although their position, size and technology is not the best.		The chasis was slim, light, very comfortable, even thinner than later IBM or Lenovo models. The laptop's case is very durable, but plastic can still crack due to age or shocks. The display hinges are overly engineered, eternal. The integrated speakers are quite good, although their position, size and technology is not the best.

	The standard HDDs supplied by Western Digital are reasonably fast and quite silent. The only drawback is that ~~IBM started using BIOS detection to nag users if an unsupported drive is used. The same annoyance is even more severe in the case of wireless cards as~~ only ~~supported~~ IBM branded or accepted cards can be used.		The standard HDDs supplied by Western Digital and Hitachi are reasonably fast and quite silent. The only drawback is that only IBM branded or accepted wireless cards can be used.

	Software support is great in Windows XP and Windows 98, if you have the ATI Radeon 7500 chipset. While it is possible to run Windows 98 SE with Radeon 9000/9600 chipsets, the graphics compatibility issues mean that you cannot reliably use it as such. It is entirely possible to dual-boot Windows 98 and Windows XP. Moreover, if you use web browsers you may notice the severe lackluster performance compared with modern expectations. The same goes for wireless as this mode of connectivity was not considered for low-latency or high speed transfers, even if, on paper, it supports well established standards.		Software support is great in Windows XP and Windows 98, if you have the ATI Radeon 7500 chipset. While it is possible to run Windows 98 SE with Radeon 9000/9600 chipsets, the graphics compatibility issues mean that you cannot reliably use it as such. It is entirely possible to dual-boot Windows 98 and Windows XP. Moreover, if you use web browsers you may notice the severe lackluster performance compared with modern expectations. The same goes for wireless as this mode of connectivity was not considered for low-latency or high speed transfers, even if, on paper, it supports well established standards.

Andrei.boiu at 16:00, 8 August 2021

2021-08-08T16:00:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 8 August 2021
Line 47:		Line 47:

	== Best retro purpose ==		== Best retro purpose ==
	Mid Windows XP era gaming (DirectX 7-8 target, DirectX 9 usable only on faster ATI Radeon 9000/9600 GPUs) or as office computer. High resolution display models are not a good choice for a couple of reasons. First, since videocards are not powerful enough for 3D accelerated games in native resolution, performance is lacking. Secondly, the Windows XP GUI looks way too small in native resolution with no magnifying applied and if applied, looks odd due to Windows scaling issues. Moreover, high resolution screens are of the IPS type, using old technology that doesn't refresh fast enough, leaving noticeable trails on fast moving objects. Contrast is also lower for IPS screens. ATI Radeon 7000 graphics models are cooler running than Radeon 9000/9600 ones but noticeably slower in 3D games. Windows Vista or 7 runs quite slow, especially on the older Radeon 7500 chipset and RAM limitations.		Mid Windows XP era gaming (DirectX 7-8 target, DirectX 9 usable only on faster ATI Radeon 9000/9600 GPUs) or as a quite modern office computer. High resolution display models are not a good choice for a couple of reasons. First, since videocards are not powerful enough for 3D accelerated games in native resolution, performance is lacking. Secondly, the Windows XP GUI looks way too small in native resolution with no magnifying applied and if applied, looks odd due to Windows scaling issues. Moreover, high resolution screens are of the IPS type, using old technology that doesn't refresh fast enough, leaving noticeable trails on fast moving objects. Contrast is also lower for IPS screens. ATI Radeon 7000 graphics models are cooler running than Radeon 9000/9600 ones but noticeably slower in 3D games. Windows Vista or 7 runs quite slow, especially on the older Radeon 7500 chipset and RAM limitations.

	In general, if you strive for better compatibility with some early 3D game, upto 2002, and Windows 98 SE compatibility along with Windows 3.1 (no acceleration, however, no DOS sound support), Radeon 7500 is well suited. If you want a very versatile system, the T42 with Radeon 7500 is the best choice out of the entire T40, T41, T42, T43 models. Of course, you have to accept some small texture quality issues due to the graphics chipset. Also, the T42 with Radeon 7500 is the most common configuration you will encounter.		In general, if you strive for better compatibility with some early 3D game, upto 2002, and Windows 98 SE compatibility along with Windows 3.1 (no acceleration, however, no DOS sound support), Radeon 7500 is well suited. If you want a very versatile system, the T42 with Radeon 7500 is the best choice out of the entire T40, T41, T42, T43 models. Of course, you have to accept some small texture quality issues due to the graphics chipset. Also, the T42 with Radeon 7500 is the most common configuration you will encounter.

Andrei.boiu at 06:49, 8 August 2021

2021-08-08T06:49:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 8 August 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:
	**ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 (32MB dedicated VRAM)		**ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 (32MB dedicated VRAM)
	**ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 (64MB dedicated VRAM)		**ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 (64MB dedicated VRAM)
	**ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (~~32MB~~ dedicated VRAM)		**ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (64MB dedicated VRAM)
	*Intel AC'97 Audio with AD1981B codec		*Intel AC'97 Audio with AD1981B codec

Andrei.boiu at 06:49, 8 August 2021

2021-08-08T06:49:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 8 August 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:
	*Graphics adapters (one of the following):		*Graphics adapters (one of the following):
	**ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 (32MB dedicated VRAM)		**ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 (32MB dedicated VRAM)
	or		**ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 (64MB dedicated VRAM)
	*ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 (64MB dedicated VRAM)		**ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (32MB dedicated VRAM)
	or
	*ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (32MB dedicated VRAM)
	*Intel AC'97 Audio with AD1981B codec		*Intel AC'97 Audio with AD1981B codec

Andrei.boiu at 06:48, 8 August 2021

2021-08-08T06:48:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 8 August 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:
	**ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 (32MB dedicated VRAM)		**ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 (32MB dedicated VRAM)
	or		or
	**ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 (64MB dedicated VRAM)		*ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 (64MB dedicated VRAM)
	or		or
	**ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (32MB dedicated VRAM)		*ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (32MB dedicated VRAM)
	*Intel AC'97 Audio with AD1981B codec		*Intel AC'97 Audio with AD1981B codec

Andrei.boiu at 06:48, 8 August 2021

2021-08-08T06:48:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 8 August 2021
Line 14:		Line 14:
	** 15.0" TFT display with 1024x768 (TFT) or 1400x1050 resolution (IPS)		** 15.0" TFT display with 1024x768 (TFT) or 1400x1050 resolution (IPS)
	*Graphics adapters (one of the following):		*Graphics adapters (one of the following):
	**Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 (shared VRAM)
	**ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 (32MB dedicated VRAM)		**ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 (32MB dedicated VRAM)
	or		or

Andrei.boiu at 06:41, 8 August 2021

2021-08-08T06:41:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:41, 8 August 2021
Line 58:		Line 58:

	== Review ==		== Review ==
	A mainstream, quite slim, powerful, business laptop, released in 2004. It had a good mix of performance parts, although it departed from the Windows 98 compatibility, had ~~DDR2~~ ram but not yet SATA or a webcam, even if these features were available at that time on other manufacturers' laptops. Overall, there are very small changes between ~~T43~~ and the previous T40, T41, ~~T42~~ series, making the ~~T43~~ series to feel ~~very~~ dated ~~and slightly underpowered~~.		A mainstream, quite slim, powerful, business laptop, released in 2004. It had a good mix of performance parts, although it departed from the Windows 98 compatibility slightly, on the more powerful ATI Radeon 9000/9600 chipsets, had DDR1 ram but not yet SATA or a webcam, even if these features were available at that time on other manufacturers' laptops. Overall, there are very small changes between T42 and the previous T40, T41, series, making the T42 series feel slightly dated.

	The LCD screen has quite good specifications but high resolution models are slightly dimmer overall and on the screen edges. Response time is very high on IPS screens, with lots of ghosting, making the laptop having this display suited only for office use. Also, due to the medium quality screen resizing, running 1024x768 or lower resolutions on 1400x1050 screens looks quite blurry. Screens can be easily replaced between similar models but the connector must also be replaced if using different T4x series screens.		The LCD screen has quite good specifications but high resolution models are slightly dimmer overall and on the screen edges. Response time is very high on IPS screens, with lots of ghosting, making the laptop having this display suited only for office use. Also, due to the medium quality screen resizing, running 1024x768 or lower resolutions on 1400x1050 screens looks quite blurry. Screens can be easily replaced between similar models but the connector must also be replaced if using different T4x series screens.

Andrei.boiu at 06:12, 8 August 2021

2021-08-08T06:12:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 8 August 2021
Line 62:		Line 62:
	The LCD screen has quite good specifications but high resolution models are slightly dimmer overall and on the screen edges. Response time is very high on IPS screens, with lots of ghosting, making the laptop having this display suited only for office use. Also, due to the medium quality screen resizing, running 1024x768 or lower resolutions on 1400x1050 screens looks quite blurry. Screens can be easily replaced between similar models but the connector must also be replaced if using different T4x series screens.		The LCD screen has quite good specifications but high resolution models are slightly dimmer overall and on the screen edges. Response time is very high on IPS screens, with lots of ghosting, making the laptop having this display suited only for office use. Also, due to the medium quality screen resizing, running 1024x768 or lower resolutions on 1400x1050 screens looks quite blurry. Screens can be easily replaced between similar models but the connector must also be replaced if using different T4x series screens.

	It has a high performance CPU, with a mixed video chipset. The CPU does not release too much heat compared with previous Pentium 4 models. Unfortunately, the higher performing models with ATI graphics require serious cooling, are noisier and operate warmer. The keyboard is durable and with good tactile feedback. The trackpad buttons are not very durable even if the trackpad itself is so. The trackpoint and keyboard are at the level of the classic, renowed IBM quality.		It has a high performance CPU, if you avoid the rare and odd Banias model, with a mixed peerformance video chipset, especially for Radeon 7500. The CPU does not release too much heat compared with previous Pentium 4 models. Unfortunately, the higher performing models with ATI graphics require serious cooling, are noisier and operate warmer. The keyboard is durable and with good tactile feedback. The trackpad buttons are not very durable even if the trackpad itself is so. The trackpoint and keyboard are at the level of the classic, renowed IBM quality.

	The removable drive bay can house an optical drive or a hard drive, if you can find a compatible caddy. was a very poor choice, since the belt driven disk rotation fails after many years, compatible belts being harder to find unreliable. The rechargeable battery can be easily removed or replaced. The BIOS and timekeeping battery is a standard CR2032 3V button cell.		The removable drive bay can house an optical drive or a hard drive, if you can find a compatible caddy. was a very poor choice, since the belt driven disk rotation fails after many years, compatible belts being harder to find unreliable. The rechargeable battery can be easily removed or replaced. The BIOS and timekeeping battery is a standard CR2032 3V button cell.
Line 70:		Line 70:
	The standard HDDs supplied by Western Digital are reasonably fast and quite silent. The only drawback is that IBM started using BIOS detection to nag users if an unsupported drive is used. The same annoyance is even more severe in the case of wireless cards as only supported IBM branded or accepted cards can be used.		The standard HDDs supplied by Western Digital are reasonably fast and quite silent. The only drawback is that IBM started using BIOS detection to nag users if an unsupported drive is used. The same annoyance is even more severe in the case of wireless cards as only supported IBM branded or accepted cards can be used.

	Software support is great in Windows XP. ~~However~~, if you use web browsers you may notice the severe lackluster performance compared with modern expectations. The same goes for wireless as this mode of connectivity was not considered for low-latency or high speed transfers, even if, on paper, it supports well established standards.		Software support is great in Windows XP and Windows 98, if you have the ATI Radeon 7500 chipset. While it is possible to run Windows 98 SE with Radeon 9000/9600 chipsets, the graphics compatibility issues mean that you cannot reliably use it as such. It is entirely possible to dual-boot Windows 98 and Windows XP. Moreover, if you use web browsers you may notice the severe lackluster performance compared with modern expectations. The same goes for wireless as this mode of connectivity was not considered for low-latency or high speed transfers, even if, on paper, it supports well established standards.

	{{footnotes\|		{{footnotes\|