1,492
edits
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) m |
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
== Review == | == Review == | ||
A midrange, somewhat compact, business laptop, released in | A midrange, somewhat compact, business laptop, released in 1993. It had an average mix of parts for a 486. The CPU is good for a 486, the video chipset is just mediocre while the soundcard positions this laptop somewhat on target with the intended goals. The only major improvement of this laptop compared with other 486 models equipped with the same video chipset is the slightly faster CPU that could run at 100 MHz. | ||
The Western Digital branded video chipset was | The Western Digital branded video chipset was decent in 1993 but seriously obsolete by 1995 or 1996, late in the product's manufacturing run. The lack of any acceleration functions means that even running Windows 3.1 in 640x480 feels sluggish and Windows 95 operation is outright slow. It is very difficult to understand why Siemens agreed to linger on with this laptop configuration and using such video chipsets that do not even expose full VESA capabilities, requiring loading a special VESA TSR to run some programs that require 640x480 in 256 colours. Also, although resolutions such as 1024x768 at 256 colors are possible, they are clearly beyond the user's patience. | ||
The inclusion of a relatively modern TFT screen, | The inclusion of a relatively modern TFT screen, although the contrast ratio and response time seems slightly lower than IBM's offerings, is one of the few saving graces in terms of technical prowess as most laptops of its era either had poor color LCDs or good but monochrome ones. RAM capabilities are mixed. The lack of standardization means that memory upgrades are quite difficult to find, as the laptop require a clearly proprietary memory module package, that looks as a slightly thick black cartridge. | ||
<youtube width="500" height="281">PupSQ8oUTxY</youtube> | <youtube width="500" height="281">PupSQ8oUTxY</youtube> | ||