Difference between revisions of "Toshiba Satellite 110CS"
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) |
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|style="vertical-align:top" | | |style="vertical-align:top" | | ||
<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;"> | <div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;"> | ||
Toshiba Satellite | Toshiba Satellite 100CS Overview | ||
== Features == | == Features == | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
[[Image:ThinkPadT60.jpg|ThinkPad T60 14.1"]] | [[Image:ThinkPadT60.jpg|ThinkPad T60 14.1"]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Benchmarks == | |||
== Review == | == Review == | ||
| Line 43: | Line 46: | ||
{{footnotes| | {{footnotes| | ||
# | # Only the screen is different between 110CS and CT models, all specifications and the potential performance is the same. The CS version was marketed as a low cost option of the CT model due to the cheaper screen. On the other side, the next model in the line, the 110CS is completely different in terms of chassis and only some parts are interchangeable. | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:T Series]] | [[Category:T Series]] | ||
Revision as of 22:18, 12 May 2021
|
Toshiba Satellite 100CS Overview Features
or
Other
|
Benchmarks
Review
A mid-range laptop, features wise, with a poor LCD screen with very low contrast even for its time. The screen has only two brightness levels, standard and energy saving, and a contrast knob that has to adjusted from time to time, for darker or lighter screens. Response time is very high, with lots of ghosting, making the laptop best suited for office use. Overall, the screen is the biggest drawback. Unfortunately, the screen cannot be easily replaced with a similar era TFT one.
It is quite fast due to the CPU being used, with a reasonably fast video controller. The CPU does get warm and the cooling system is not that great, but the laptop handles constant heat quite well. The keyboard has reasonable tactile feedback but it is far from being the best, with quite a long key travel and a mushy feel. The Accupoint cursor system (mouse compatible) is reasonably accurate but the cap disintegrates and the click buttons rubbery face does so just as well, in time, becoming sticky. The laptop's plastic case is quite durable but not the best.
The FDD drive was a very poor choice, since the belt driven disk rotation fails after many years, belts are harder to find and replace. The removable disk bay is very good for a laptop of its generation and the rechargeable battery can be easily removed or replaced. There were many Toshiba laptops that used the same battery and working with a removed battery does not affect stability or aesthetics. There are two more internal rechargeable NimH batteries inside the laptop that may leak and are somewhat harder to replace (not the typical CR2032 3V button cell).
The standard HDDs supplied by Toshiba have a known tendency to have their heads stuck when old, making the drive fail to start. Careful internal dissassembly is required to unstick the heads from the parking position. Use care and touch only the drive arm near the center pin to slowly unstick it.
Software support is great in DOS and Windows 3.1, making the system feel snappy. DOS sound capability is great, with good Adlib compatibility and Sound Blaster Pro emulation. It does not require any TSR or configuration to enable DOS support. In Windows 95 you start to feel the sluggishness of the system as the video controller has insufficient acceleration and low screen scrolling performance. Basically Toshiba used the same platform on 486 and Pentium laptops which kept RAM and Video performance from being as high as it could. Although the video controller is faster than some Trident models, it is far from Neomagic ones.