ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 15 OLED

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Features Silver (M) or Black (K) chassis One of the following non-upgradeable configurations: Intel Core i5 11300H 3.1 GHz 4 core CPU on K or M3x0xPx model series Intel Core i7 11370H 3.3 GHz 4 core CPU on K or M3x0xPx model series AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 3.2 GHz 8 core CPU on K or M3x0xQx model series AMD Ryzen 7 5900H 3.3 GHz 8 core CPU on K or M3x0xQx model series One of the following non-upgradeable configurations 8 DDR4 memory standard (soldered to mainboard) on K or M xxx0 models 16 DDR4 memory standard (soldered to mainboard) on K or M xxx1 models 14 and 15 inch laptops use different chassis: 14.1" 90Hz OLED (Samsung AMOLED) 2.8k 2880x1800 on K or M340xxx models 15.6" 60Hz OLED (Samsung AMOLED) Full HD 1920x1080 on K or M350xxx models One of the following keyboards standard, 3 brightness levels back-lit, on 14 inch models with numerical keypad, 3 brightness levels back-lit, on 15 inch models Graphics adapters (one of the following): Intel Iris Xe Graphics on K or MxxxxPA models AMD Radeon Graphics on K or MxxxxQA models Intel Iris and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB GDDR6 on K or MxxxxPH models AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB GDDR6 on K or MxxxxQC models Realtek HD Audio One of the following storage options: 512GB PCIe M.2 NVMe SSD 512GB PCIe M.2 NVMe SSD and 32GB Intel Optane Combo (rare) 1TB PCIe M.2 NVMe SSD MiniPCI Express slot with 2x2 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6) Adapter Bluetooth 5.0 communication Other 720p integrated camera Stereo speakers (downfiring) HDMI 1.4 Output 63Wh Li Ion rechargeable battery 1xUSB 3.2 type A port 1 Thunderbolt 4 port (Intel CPU models) 1 USB 3.2 Type C port (AMD CPU models) microSD card reader 3.5mm combo audio jack 65, 90 or 120W 19V power supply (separate) Windows 10, 11 support

Best purpose

Configuration suitability depends on use scenarios. Graphics designers and gamers should opt for the smaller 14 inch model which has a much better screen resolution and refresh rate. Serious gamers should avoid integrated graphics models and choose dedicated graphics configurations. Multiprocessor performance is much better with the AMD choice so if you edit videos the models having the Ryzen 7 or 9 processors are preferred. However, you should keep in mind that this laptop series is not for hard-core gaming, the dedicated graphics card do not offer sufficient performance for more demanding titles.

Durability and Repair-ability

Good plastic quality means that case cracks are less common than on other models but the model by itself is not immune. Removable and the fixed drive bay are easy to access and the case itself is easy to disassemble due to obvious markings on the laptop's underside as well as masking black tape placed on screws. Many generations (series) of laptops, such as the T60/T61 use the same easy to find screws, trackpads and buttons, keyboards, cooling systems are interchangeable while screens, palmrests, bezels are specific to laptops sizes.

The LCD screen's fluorescent backlight is easier to replace since there is plenty of space and a good design on the screen's casing and light dispersion system to accommodate newer and thinner lamps or thicker classic ones. LCD screens can be inter-changed to suit a specific native resolution requirement if the proper original cabling is available. Fans and the fan blades can be easily cleaned and bearings can be easily greased, providing long service life since fan casing stud mountings can be pried open and placed back again.

Greatest features & flaws

Features	Flaws
Good contrast and colour gamut (one of the last 4:3 screen laptops)	Very small GPU performance increase compared with Thinkpad T43 models
Good performance on Core 2 Duo CPU	Mediocre on Core Duo and very low performance on Core Solo CPU
Durable, comfortable trackpad and buttons, stiff keyboard	No DVI/HDMI output except on docking station
Good, somewhat quiet cooling system	Annoying IBM/Lenovo BIOS limitation of approved Wifi cards

Review

A mainstream, quite slim, moderately powerful, business laptop, released in 2006. It had an average mix of performance parts, with a better than average CPU (when using the Core 2 Duo option) but a somewhat lacking graphics module and more fragmentation, due to the similarly equipped Radeon X1300 and X1400 graphics chipsets and the lackluster Intel GPU also available for ordering.

The platform is centered on Windows XP compatibility, with DDR2 RAM and SATA but not yet a webcam, even if these features were available at that time on other manufacturers' laptops. Overall, there are very small changes between T43 and the previous T60 model in terms of graphics performance although some chassis changes are highly welcome. The trackpad is strongly improved, being more confortable and more reliable due to better buttons and sensitivity. Cooling is the most severe improvement, having an estimated 50-75% improvement in capacity and reduced noise at various fan speeds, mostly due to the requirement of handling faster CPUs. to feel very dated and slightly underpowered.

The LCD screen has slightly improved specifications in terms of response time, contrast. Higher resolution models are reasonably close in terms of performance compared with standard resolution ones, limiting the drawbacks compared with the T43 series. The choice of resolution depends mostly on the target OS, with the 1024x768 resolution better suited for Windows XP while the 1400x1050 resolution is better suited for Windows Vista and Seven. The 1600x1200 resolution is suited only for specific use cases. Screens can be easily replaced between similar models but the connector must also be replaced if using different T6x series displays. The widescreen variant is somewhat useless due to the lackluster graphics chipsets available not allowing good enough native resolution performance so they should be avoided. Also, some XP era games might not run or look great on widescreen displays. On the other side, the widescreen model has better audio capabilities due to a different speaker placement, on the top of the chassis, near the screen assembly.

It has a high performance CPU, especially in the Intel Core 2 Duo variant. The Intel Core Duo Cpu is quite a mixed bag as it does not support 64bit operating systems and it is quite slower than the Intel Core 2 Duo CPU, and slightly sluggish in certain cases (lower cache and latency performance). This makes the Core Solo option entirely unacceptable. The Intel video chipset is a very poor option as it does not support Hardware TnL or other capabilities, making it suitable for legacy gaming or application support. The CPU cooling is adequate for all CPU options. Higher performing models with ATI graphics require are only slightly noisier and warmer. The keyboard is quite durable but slightly less stiff and with a noticeable poorer quality feel. The slow decline in build quality becomes obvious on this last fully IBM developed laptop.

The removable drive bay can house an optical drive or a hard drive, if you can find a compatible caddy. The rechargeable battery can be easily removed or replaced. The BIOS and timekeeping battery is a standard CR2032 3V button cell.

The chasis was slightly larger than the T4x series but it is more rounded and even mor comfortable. The laptop's case is slightly less durable than the T4x series, but it holds up well to other durable laptops, while being lighter than the T4x series. The display hinges are overly engineered, with great durability. The integrated speakers are quite good, although their position, size and technology is not the best.

The standard HDDs supplied by Western Digital are reasonably fast and quite silent. The SATA drives offer a good performance boost compared with the T4x series PATA drives, while also supporting exotic, very fast, modern SSDs. No restriction is placed on HDD types. The only compatibility drawback is that only IBM branded or accepted wireless cards can be used.

Software support is good on Windows XP but slightly less polished for Windows Seven. This is somewhat obvious as drivers are actually released with full compatibility upto Windows Vista and the lackluster Intel video chipset is entirely unsuitable for the Windows 7 GUI acceleration requirements.