Difference between revisions of "Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e"

(Created page with "__NOTOC__ {| width="100%" |style="vertical-align:top" | <div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;"> IBM Thinkpad 370C Overview == Features == *Intel 486 DX4 75MHz CPU *4MB memory on-board, 36MB max with 2x32MB modules (on proprietary cards) *10.4" TFT display (640x480 resolution, 100:1 contrast ratio) *Western Digital WD90C24A video chipset 1MB VRAM (1024x768 256 colour capable)...")
 
m
 
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|style="vertical-align:top" |
|style="vertical-align:top" |
<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;">
<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;">
IBM Thinkpad 370C Overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e Overview


== Features ==
== Features ==
*Intel 486 DX4 75MHz CPU
*Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670 (10 nm) chipset
*4MB memory on-board, 36MB max with 2x32MB modules (on proprietary cards)
*Octa-core CPU (2x2 GHz performance cores, 6x1.7 GHz efficiency cores)
*10.4" TFT display (640x480 resolution, 100:1 contrast ratio)
*10.5" AMOLED display (2560x1600 resolution, infinite:1 contrast ratio)
*Western Digital WD90C24A video chipset 1MB VRAM (1024x768 256 colour capable)
*Adreno 615 video chipset
*340 or 540MB standard, 810MB or 1.2GB maximum PATA HDD
*64GB internal eMMC storage with 4GB of RAM
*UltraBay with 1.44MB FDD
or
*No soundcard
*128GB internal eMMC storage with 6GB of RAM


=== Other ===
=== Other ===
*Mono speaker (PC beeper only)
*13MP main camera, 8MP front camera
*2xPCMCIA Slots
*4k at 30fps recording mode for main camera
*VGA Output
*Single USB-C 3.1 port, Bluetooth 5.0
*NimH rechargeable battery
*802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi (SM-T720 and 725 models)
*Dual PS/2, Serial, Parallel ports
*LTE 4G support (SM-T725 model only)
*20V power supply (separate)
*4 speakers, AKG/Harman tuning
*Li-Po 7040 mAh rechargeable battery, 18W fast charging capable


*Windows 3.1, IBM OS/2, Windows 95, (slightly slow on Windows 95)
*Android 9 to Android 11 supported
</div>
</div>
|style="vertical-align:top" |
|style="vertical-align:top" |
[[Image:IBM 370C.jpg|IBM 370C 10.4"]]
[[Image:Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e.png|Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e 10.5"]]
|}
|}


== Best retro purpose ==
== Best purpose ==
Early DOS and Windows 3.1 era gaming, for titles released before 1995 or as office computer. Unfortunately, despite the somewhat adequate CPU speed, the video chipset is definitely too slow for anything beyond 320x200 resolution and even 640x480 resolution is quite taxing on Windows 3.1. DOS games support is quite good if you do not need any soundcard and the PC beeper is enough.
Due to the great OLED screen but quite low performance of other components, at least compared to the potential of such a device in this format, the tablet is best suited for reading, browsing the internet and using video sharing such as YouTube or social sharing websites. GoogleEarth navigation is not as smooth as expected. The low CPU performance does not bode well for demanding 3D games, but less graphically intensive applications are fine. Augmented reality applications are probably fine, as the display's contrast is advantageous and response times are not expected to be very high on such devices.


== Benchmarks ==
== Benchmarks ==


== Durability and Repair-ability ==
== Durability and Repair-ability ==
The plastic quality of most of the chassis is quite good for such an old laptop and the liftable keyboard allows easy access to the floppy drive, hard-drive, battery and RAM. The LCD screen has a fluorescent backlight that is potentially difficult to replace as screens used by IBM on similar laptops can be quite cumbersome to dissassemble (the IBM Thinkpad 755 series). The rubberized coating that flakes over time is one of the most annoying feature of the laptop, as the smell, dirt and stickiness of its gets worse as the laptop aged. It can be cleaned with careful wiping using a smooth sponge and mild concentration iso-propyl alcohol or another alcohol solution.
The build quality seems good, with reasonably sturdy materials. No high hopes for impact survivability as the front glass has no special reinforced glass design other than a typical mid-range smartphone. As is typical with all tablets, there is no way of easily replacing the internal battery. A protection cover is essential and a smart one, that also holds its closed position, along with automatically triggering the screen on and off is recommended.


== Greatest features & flaws ==
== Greatest features & flaws ==
Line 41: Line 42:
! Features !! Flaws  
! Features !! Flaws  
|-
|-
| Average Windows 3.1 DOS Gaming platform || Cumbersome Windows graphics support
| Great OLED screen with unbeatable contrast || Blue colour rendering less than perfect
|-
|-
| Compact laptop || Too slow on Windows 95, limited RAM expansion capability
| Slim design || Slow chipset and CPU as with most tablets
|-
|-
| Durable, comfortable keyboard and trackpoint || Poor video chipset, no soundcard
| Reasonably good camera image quality || Insufficient battery capacity/power efficiency for whole day operation
|-
|-
| Great Floppy and harddrive access || Proprietary power supply connector
| Good sound reproduction capability || Mediocre to poor wi-fi performance
|}
|}


== Review ==
== Review ==
A midrange, somewhat compact, business laptop, released in 1995. It had a below average mix of parts for a 486. While the CPU is good for a 486, the sub-par video chipset and the lack of any soundcard seriously position this laptop as more of a low-end model, despite what IBM stated.
A midrange tablet released in 2019. The highlight of this model is the always enticing OLED screen, with perfect display uniformity, contrast and visual comfort.The screen has also a high resolution and pixel density. Unfortunately, despite the release date of this model, the screen does not feature any HDR10 capability and colour reproduction is slightly disappointing for blues, as they look closer to purple. This is typical of older OLED display technology. Vertical screen scrolling can be slightly annoying due to colour motion blur effect, as updates are slower than expected. However, the contrast and uniformity of the display make the visual comfort close to perfect in most circumstances.


The Western Digital branded video chipset was already obsolete by the time of the laptop's release. The lack of any acceleration functions means that even running Windows 3.1 in 640x480 feels sluggish and Windows 95 operation feels very slow. It is very difficult to understand why IBM insisted on using such video chipsets that do not even expose VESA capabilities, requiring loading a special VESA TSR to be able to run Windows in 640x480 resolution. Also, although resolutions such as 1024x768 at 256 colors are possible, they are clearly beyond the user's patience.
The chipset is, clearly, the major design issue. As with most tablets, and especially so for Samsung ones, the CPU specifications are way too conservative. In general, poor performance can be more readily accepted on smaller screens, like ones of mobile phones, but tablets should have much better CPUs as they drive bigger screens, were any slowdown is that much more noticeable. Moreover, as tablets are expected to have longer usability time, poorer performing CPUs also tend to use up more of the battery's capacity. However, Samsung is not the only manufacturer to blame for this approach as most Android tablets do not have better CPU/GPU and chipset combinations.


The inclusion of a relatively modern TFT screen, having a good contrast ratio and response time is one of the few saving graces in terms of technical prowess as most laptops of its era either had poor color LCDs or good but monochrome ones. RAM capabilities are mixed. The lack of standardization means that memory upgrades are quite difficult to find, as the laptop require a potentially proprietary memory module standard, the so-called memory module adapter, that looks like PCMCIA but is not PCMCIA, to be used.
The tablet's responsiveness is decent, albeit laggy in some instances, especially when browsing the internet or using more demanding applications. The 4GB RAM configuration feels outright obsolete considering the screen and potential of the tablet, but it is, again, in line with other manufacturers' poor design decisions. A tablet with such a high resolution screen should have 6 and 8GB RAM configurations to ensure better response, especially when the rest of the configuration is not fast enough. 4GB RAM configurations are somewhat minimal even for midrange phones.


<youtube width="500" height="281">PupSQ8oUTxY</youtube>
<youtube width="500" height="281">1iiKe2iNQWw</youtube>


The included standard capacity harddrive is not adequate as even modest Windows 95 installations with a Microsoft Office 95 package can take around more than 300MB. The harddrive itself is noisy and very bulky (12mm height) but the plastic drive cage along with the laptop's own casing offer excellent noise damping capabilities as metal frames are almost entirely avoided.
The battery capacity is another disappointment. As the CPU and screen are not particularly energy efficient, reasonably intense operation of the tablet is unlikely to reach a whole day without recharging. The camera performance is decent for a tablet, in-line with average expectations for such a device, as cameras usage is not particularly concerning in this scenario. The sound capabilities of the tablet are notable, with the sound system tuned by AKG/Harman, but they are still not as good as on upper-midrange Samsung mobile phones from the S series.


One of the famous features of this laptop is the easily lift-able keyboard that is operated by sliding some side latches on the chassis. This offers very easy access to most internal parts such as the battery, harddrive, floppy drive, memory. This was a very nice design feature that, fortunately, does not compromise too much the laptop's rigidity, keyboard feel and durability. Although latches can be damaged with improper operation they do withstand long use quite well and the keyboard hinges survives some rough handling.
The wireless performance of the tablet is nothing to be excited. Although the tablet supports Wi-Fi 5 or 802.11 ac standard, networking performance is significantly lower than expected for a typical upper market tablet and transfers may be slightly slower than on similarly equipped mid-range phones. This means that watching 1080p60fps video clips may be quite difficult in some cases.


The keyboard, trackpoint and trackpoint buttons are at the classic IBM standard. While the keyboard is not quite the best, mainly due to the lift-able design feature that reduced the travelling distance of the keys and made the keyboard feel more rigid than it should, it is still good compared with some low-end products of other manufacturers.
The included software installation has about the same issue as most tablets: not enough applications can be uninstalled to reduce the impact of unnecessary ones using CPU and RAM resources, dragging down the system performance. Other than that, the Android and OneUI 3 experience is pretty typical. Android 11 runs decent on 4GB RAM configurations.
 
Software support is a mixed experience. While hardware capabilities are not outright bad, the video chipset seriously limit comfortable operating systems to Windows 3.1. Although Windows 95 is entirely possible, you should have at least 16MB of RAM available. DOS gaming is below average as anything newer than Wolfenstein 3D is barely playable, as is the case for the venerable DOOM.


{{footnotes|
{{footnotes|

Latest revision as of 14:31, 4 April 2022

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e Overview

Features

  • Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670 (10 nm) chipset
  • Octa-core CPU (2x2 GHz performance cores, 6x1.7 GHz efficiency cores)
  • 10.5" AMOLED display (2560x1600 resolution, infinite:1 contrast ratio)
  • Adreno 615 video chipset
  • 64GB internal eMMC storage with 4GB of RAM

or

  • 128GB internal eMMC storage with 6GB of RAM

Other

  • 13MP main camera, 8MP front camera
  • 4k at 30fps recording mode for main camera
  • Single USB-C 3.1 port, Bluetooth 5.0
  • 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi (SM-T720 and 725 models)
  • LTE 4G support (SM-T725 model only)
  • 4 speakers, AKG/Harman tuning
  • Li-Po 7040 mAh rechargeable battery, 18W fast charging capable
  • Android 9 to Android 11 supported

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e 10.5"

Best purpose

Due to the great OLED screen but quite low performance of other components, at least compared to the potential of such a device in this format, the tablet is best suited for reading, browsing the internet and using video sharing such as YouTube or social sharing websites. GoogleEarth navigation is not as smooth as expected. The low CPU performance does not bode well for demanding 3D games, but less graphically intensive applications are fine. Augmented reality applications are probably fine, as the display's contrast is advantageous and response times are not expected to be very high on such devices.

Benchmarks

Durability and Repair-ability

The build quality seems good, with reasonably sturdy materials. No high hopes for impact survivability as the front glass has no special reinforced glass design other than a typical mid-range smartphone. As is typical with all tablets, there is no way of easily replacing the internal battery. A protection cover is essential and a smart one, that also holds its closed position, along with automatically triggering the screen on and off is recommended.

Greatest features & flaws

Features Flaws
Great OLED screen with unbeatable contrast Blue colour rendering less than perfect
Slim design Slow chipset and CPU as with most tablets
Reasonably good camera image quality Insufficient battery capacity/power efficiency for whole day operation
Good sound reproduction capability Mediocre to poor wi-fi performance

Review

A midrange tablet released in 2019. The highlight of this model is the always enticing OLED screen, with perfect display uniformity, contrast and visual comfort.The screen has also a high resolution and pixel density. Unfortunately, despite the release date of this model, the screen does not feature any HDR10 capability and colour reproduction is slightly disappointing for blues, as they look closer to purple. This is typical of older OLED display technology. Vertical screen scrolling can be slightly annoying due to colour motion blur effect, as updates are slower than expected. However, the contrast and uniformity of the display make the visual comfort close to perfect in most circumstances.

The chipset is, clearly, the major design issue. As with most tablets, and especially so for Samsung ones, the CPU specifications are way too conservative. In general, poor performance can be more readily accepted on smaller screens, like ones of mobile phones, but tablets should have much better CPUs as they drive bigger screens, were any slowdown is that much more noticeable. Moreover, as tablets are expected to have longer usability time, poorer performing CPUs also tend to use up more of the battery's capacity. However, Samsung is not the only manufacturer to blame for this approach as most Android tablets do not have better CPU/GPU and chipset combinations.

The tablet's responsiveness is decent, albeit laggy in some instances, especially when browsing the internet or using more demanding applications. The 4GB RAM configuration feels outright obsolete considering the screen and potential of the tablet, but it is, again, in line with other manufacturers' poor design decisions. A tablet with such a high resolution screen should have 6 and 8GB RAM configurations to ensure better response, especially when the rest of the configuration is not fast enough. 4GB RAM configurations are somewhat minimal even for midrange phones.

The battery capacity is another disappointment. As the CPU and screen are not particularly energy efficient, reasonably intense operation of the tablet is unlikely to reach a whole day without recharging. The camera performance is decent for a tablet, in-line with average expectations for such a device, as cameras usage is not particularly concerning in this scenario. The sound capabilities of the tablet are notable, with the sound system tuned by AKG/Harman, but they are still not as good as on upper-midrange Samsung mobile phones from the S series.

The wireless performance of the tablet is nothing to be excited. Although the tablet supports Wi-Fi 5 or 802.11 ac standard, networking performance is significantly lower than expected for a typical upper market tablet and transfers may be slightly slower than on similarly equipped mid-range phones. This means that watching 1080p60fps video clips may be quite difficult in some cases.

The included software installation has about the same issue as most tablets: not enough applications can be uninstalled to reduce the impact of unnecessary ones using CPU and RAM resources, dragging down the system performance. Other than that, the Android and OneUI 3 experience is pretty typical. Android 11 runs decent on 4GB RAM configurations.

Template:Footnotes