1,492
edits
Difference between revisions of "Philips Master SOX-E and SOX"
Philips Master SOX-E and SOX (view source)
Revision as of 10:51, 12 November 2021
, 10:51, 12 November 2021no edit summary
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) |
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|style="vertical-align:top" | | |style="vertical-align:top" | | ||
<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;"> | <div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;"> | ||
High efficiency Low Pressure Sodium Lamp with tubular bulb for outdoor lighting with 18 to 131W power rating (SOX-E) and 35 to 180W power rating (SOX standard) | High efficiency Low Pressure Sodium Lamp with tubular bulb for outdoor lighting with 18 to 131W power rating (SOX-E or SOX Economy) and 35 to 180W power rating (SOX standard) | ||
== Features == | == Features == | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Due to their yellow, monochromatic light, these lamps are rarely more than an option for lighting exterior areas. Although they are very efficient light sources, their light is unpleasant for just about any application. Their BY22d base is not as popular as others but large amount of lamps, fixtures and gears can still be found, used, on Great Britain, as this was a very large market. Fixtures can be easily adapted for low pressure sodium lamps, especially if they are made for linear flourescent lamps, as their gear can also operate them well, if rated at nearly the same wattage. | Due to their yellow, monochromatic light, these lamps are rarely more than an option for lighting exterior areas. Although they are very efficient light sources, their light is unpleasant for just about any application. Their BY22d base is not as popular as others but large amount of lamps, fixtures and gears can still be found, used, on Great Britain, as this was a very large market. Fixtures can be easily adapted for low pressure sodium lamps, especially if they are made for linear flourescent lamps, as their gear can also operate them well, if rated at nearly the same wattage. | ||
Fixtures that work quite well and were reasonably plentiful for sodium vapour lamps are outdoor lighting ones for compact fluorescent lamps, especially the | Fixtures that work quite well and were reasonably plentiful for sodium vapour lamps are outdoor lighting ones for compact fluorescent lamps, especially the Philips PL-L line or compatible products from other manufacturers, as their shape is similar. These fixtures can be easily recognized due to their rectangular shape and prismatic, clear diffuser. The lamp base is obviously incompatible and the power rating of the ballast or lamp gear may not be entirely suited but retrofitting is entirely possible. | ||
== Understanding manufacturer data == | == Understanding manufacturer data == | ||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
This lamp technology was successfully developed in the 1930s and improved upon in later decades. The most important achievements were higher quality arc tubes and gas fillings. The same improvements were made on the outer envelope, ensuring reduced heat losses and sodium retention. The low pressure sodium lamp was actually at the center of development on the much more successful and attractive high pressure sodium lamp, some decades later. This lamp technology has the special distinction of being the most efficient light source ever devised, reaching over 200 luments/watt in the case of the last designs, such as on Philips SOX-E. | This lamp technology was successfully developed in the 1930s and improved upon in later decades. The most important achievements were higher quality arc tubes and gas fillings. The same improvements were made on the outer envelope, ensuring reduced heat losses and sodium retention. The low pressure sodium lamp was actually at the center of development on the much more successful and attractive high pressure sodium lamp, some decades later. This lamp technology has the special distinction of being the most efficient light source ever devised, reaching over 200 luments/watt in the case of the last designs, such as on Philips SOX-E. | ||
The most important competition, early on, was the incandescent lamp, since its light was warm as well while energy efficiency was much improved. The only drawback that sodium vapour lamps had was the requirement for an additional component, the ballast. In general, due to the warm yellow light, this lamps was highly successful in colder climates such as Great Britain and other northern hemisphere countries. This lamp technology experienced some competition from mercury vapour lamps early on. While sodium lamps of that time fared slightly better in terms of efficiency, they were shorter lived than their counterparts. To the disadvantage of very poor skin rendition of the mercury vapour lamps, the sodium lamped fared slightly better with its monochromatic light. The only issue that would always remain in this competition is that low pressure sodium lamps were never as compact as mercury vapour ones so more efficient directional lighting could theoretically be achieved with mercury vapour lamps. Of course, this was not | The most important competition, early on, was the incandescent lamp, since its light was warm as well while energy efficiency was much improved. The only drawback that sodium vapour lamps had was the requirement for an additional component, the ballast. In general, due to the warm yellow light, this lamps was highly successful in colder climates such as Great Britain and other northern hemisphere countries. This lamp technology experienced some competition from mercury vapour lamps early on. While sodium lamps of that time fared slightly better in terms of efficiency, they were shorter lived than their counterparts. To the disadvantage of very poor skin rendition of the mercury vapour lamps, the sodium lamped fared slightly better with its monochromatic light. The only issue that would always remain in this competition is that low pressure sodium lamps were never as compact as mercury vapour ones so more efficient directional lighting could theoretically be achieved with mercury vapour lamps. Of course, this was not realized in practice as the low cost of mercury vapour lamps was also a criteria for fixtures selection which meant that system efficiency was always very poor on mercury vapour and only slightly less so on low pressure sodium lamps. | ||
Streetlighting was a very common application. As the oil crisis of the 1970s was taking place, there was a strong demand for improved energy efficiency. One research goal was improving the already successful lamp, reducing heat losses of the lamp, as it was already producing reduced light at low temperatures. Special coatings could be applied on the outer envelope, further reducing heat losses and improving efficiency. Of course, this goal was not very easy to achieve as the coating had to survive long term use, absorb as little light as possible and not affect the appearance of the lamp. Special lamp gears were also designed, that had electronic circuitry. This meant that higher energy efficiency was achievable through a combination of better power management, high frequency operation and smoother starts and warmups, giving rise to SOX-E lamps. | Streetlighting was a very common application. As the oil crisis of the 1970s was taking place, there was a strong demand for improved energy efficiency. One research goal was improving the already successful lamp, reducing heat losses of the lamp, as it was already producing reduced light at low temperatures. Special coatings could be applied on the outer envelope, further reducing heat losses and improving efficiency. Of course, this goal was not very easy to achieve as the coating had to survive long term use, absorb as little light as possible and not affect the appearance of the lamp. Special lamp gears were also designed, that had electronic circuitry. This meant that higher energy efficiency was achievable through a combination of better power management, high frequency operation and smoother starts and warmups, giving rise to SOX-E lamps. | ||
The market slowly | The market slowly shrank, by the late 2000s, as high pressure sodium and metal hallide lamps became successful or when LED lighting became popular. It may seem strange that LED technology replaced the more energy efficient high pressure and low pressure sodium lamps but some aspects have to be considered. A good LED lamp design centers on efficient light distribution, that is almost 99% downwards, right from the light source. The development of electronic components brought many potential improvements in service life and output but these lamp gears were not as popular as conventional, magnetic ones, due to cost and labour requirements for updating fixtures. This meant that most light fixtures were used continuously with outdated technology, many decades. This is just one of the many reasons for which outdoor lighting was far from its theoretical potential and what made it seem that LEDs brought a revolution in this respect. | ||
A typical lamp fixture is a compromise as all previous lamps that were generating light almost omnidirectional or slightly directional, as in the case of low pressure sodium lamps. If the fixture's diffuser was not maintained in a clean state and if water, dirt may get inside the fixture, as it commonly happens, the lighting system efficiency is also reduced. In practice, only about 60% of the designed light reaches the desired target with a new lamp and a 5-7 year old fixture. LED lighting fixtures can maintain virtually all the initial light output efficiency, as the very compact lens system is entirely sealed and remains sealed for the entire lamp life. | |||
== Manufacturing specificities == | == Manufacturing specificities == | ||