1,492
edits
Difference between revisions of "Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) m (→Other) |
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi (SM-T720 and 725 models) | *802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi (SM-T720 and 725 models) | ||
*LTE 4G support (SM-T725 model only) | *LTE 4G support (SM-T725 model only) | ||
*4 speakers | *4 speakers, AKG/Harman tuning | ||
*Li-Po 7040 mAh rechargeable battery, 18W fast charging capable | *Li-Po 7040 mAh rechargeable battery, 18W fast charging capable | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Best purpose == | == Best purpose == | ||
Due to the great OLED screen | Due to the great OLED screen but quite low performance of other components, at least compared to the potential of such a device in this format, the tablet is best suited for reading, browsing the internet and using video sharing such as YouTube or social sharing websites. GoogleEarth navigation is not as smooth as expected. The low CPU performance does not bode well for demanding 3D games, but less graphically intensive applications are fine. Augmented reality applications are probably fine, as the display's contrast is advantageous and response times are not expected to be very high on such devices. | ||
== Benchmarks == | == Benchmarks == | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
<youtube width="500" height="281">1iiKe2iNQWw</youtube> | <youtube width="500" height="281">1iiKe2iNQWw</youtube> | ||
The battery capacity is another disappointment. As the CPU and screen are not particularly energy efficient, reasonably intense operation of the tablet is unlikely to reach a whole day without recharging. The camera performance is decent for a tablet, in-line with average expectations for such a device, as cameras usage is not particularly concerning in this scenario. | The battery capacity is another disappointment. As the CPU and screen are not particularly energy efficient, reasonably intense operation of the tablet is unlikely to reach a whole day without recharging. The camera performance is decent for a tablet, in-line with average expectations for such a device, as cameras usage is not particularly concerning in this scenario. The sound capabilities of the tablet are notable, with the sound system tuned by AKG/Harman, but they are still not as good as on upper-midrange Samsung mobile phones from the S series. | ||
The wireless performance of the tablet is nothing to be excited. Although the tablet supports Wi-Fi 5 or 802.11 ac standard, networking performance is significantly lower than expected for a typical upper market tablet and transfers may be slightly slower than on similarly equipped mid-range phones. This means that watching 1080p60fps video clips may be quite difficult in some cases. | The wireless performance of the tablet is nothing to be excited. Although the tablet supports Wi-Fi 5 or 802.11 ac standard, networking performance is significantly lower than expected for a typical upper market tablet and transfers may be slightly slower than on similarly equipped mid-range phones. This means that watching 1080p60fps video clips may be quite difficult in some cases. | ||
The included software installation has about the same issue as most tablets: not enough applications can be uninstalled to reduce the impact of | The included software installation has about the same issue as most tablets: not enough applications can be uninstalled to reduce the impact of unnecessary ones using CPU and RAM resources, dragging down the system performance. Other than that, the Android and OneUI 3 experience is pretty typical. Android 11 runs decent on 4GB RAM configurations. | ||
{{footnotes| | {{footnotes| | ||