1,492
edits
Difference between revisions of "Samsung Galaxy A52s"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Greatest features & flaws
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ {| width="100%" |style="vertical-align:top" | <div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;"> Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e Overview == Features == *Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670 (10 nm) chipset *Octa-core CPU (2x2 GHz performance cores, 6x1.7 GHz efficiency cores) *10.5" AMOLED display (2560x1600 resolution, infinite:1 contrast ratio) *Adreno 615 video chipset *64GB internal eMM...") |
Andrei.boiu (talk | contribs) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|style="vertical-align:top" | | |style="vertical-align:top" | | ||
<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;"> | <div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;"> | ||
Samsung Galaxy | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Overview | ||
== Features == | == Features == | ||
*Qualcomm | *Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G (6 nm) chipset | ||
*Octa-core CPU ( | *Octa-core Kyro CPU (4x2.4 GHz performance cores, 4x1.9 GHz efficiency cores) | ||
* | *6.5" Super AMOLED 120Hz display (2400x1080 resolution, infinite:1 contrast ratio) | ||
*Adreno | *Adreno 642L video chipset | ||
* | *128GB internal eMMC storage with 4, 6 or 8GB of RAM | ||
or | or | ||
* | *256GB internal eMMC storage with 6 or 8GB of RAM | ||
=== Other === | === Other === | ||
* | *64MP (32MP real) main camera, 32MP front camera | ||
*4k at 30fps recording mode for main camera | *4k at 30fps recording mode for main camera | ||
*Single USB-C | *Single USB-C 2.0 port, Bluetooth 5.0 | ||
*802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi | *802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi 6 | ||
*LTE | *LTE 5G support | ||
* | *2 speakers | ||
*Li-Po | *Li-Po 4500 mAh rechargeable battery, 25W fast charging capable | ||
*Android | *Android 11 to Android 12 supported, OneUI 4 | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
|style="vertical-align:top" | | |style="vertical-align:top" | | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
! Features !! Flaws | ! Features !! Flaws | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Excellent, hi-res OLED screen, great colour rendering || Mediocre camera sensor output quality | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Well sized, fast 120Hz refresh rate screen || Can get warm when used intensively | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Good 5G performance, Wi-Fi 6 performance, battery life || Speaker system could be better | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Good | | Good RAM and storage size options || Confusing selection of physical cameras in Camera app | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Review == | == Review == | ||
A midrange | A midrange phone released in 2021. The highlight of this model is the always enticing OLED screen, with perfect display uniformity, contrast and visual comfort.The screen has also a high resolution and pixel density. Unfortunately, despite the release date of this model, the screen does not feature any HDR10 capability and colour reproduction is slightly disappointing for blues, as they look closer to purple. This is typical of older OLED display technology. Vertical screen scrolling can be slightly annoying due to colour motion blur effect, as updates are slower than expected. However, the contrast and uniformity of the display make the visual comfort close to perfect in most circumstances. | ||
The chipset is, clearly, the major design issue. As with most tablets, and especially so for Samsung ones, the CPU specifications are way too conservative. In general, poor performance can be more readily accepted on smaller screens, like ones of mobile phones, but tablets should have much better CPUs as they drive bigger screens, were any slowdown is that much more noticeable. Moreover, as tablets are expected to have longer usability time, poorer performing CPUs also tend to use up more of the battery's capacity. However, Samsung is not the only manufacturer to blame for this approach as most Android tablets do not have better CPU/GPU and chipset combinations. | The chipset is, clearly, the major design issue. As with most tablets, and especially so for Samsung ones, the CPU specifications are way too conservative. In general, poor performance can be more readily accepted on smaller screens, like ones of mobile phones, but tablets should have much better CPUs as they drive bigger screens, were any slowdown is that much more noticeable. Moreover, as tablets are expected to have longer usability time, poorer performing CPUs also tend to use up more of the battery's capacity. However, Samsung is not the only manufacturer to blame for this approach as most Android tablets do not have better CPU/GPU and chipset combinations. | ||