Difference between revisions of "IBM Thinkpad X61s"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,761 bytes removed ,  23:08, 3 September 2021
m
no edit summary
m
m
Line 4: Line 4:
<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;">
<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;">
IBM Thinkpad X61s Overview
IBM Thinkpad X61s Overview
The Thinkpad X61s is a slightly thinner, lighter, X61 with a slightly slower CPU


== Features ==
== Features ==
Line 34: Line 36:
</div>
</div>
|style="vertical-align:top" |
|style="vertical-align:top" |
[[Image:IBM_T60.jpg|IBM T60 14"]]
[[Image:IBM_X61.jpg|IBM X61 12.1"]]
|}
|}


== Best retro purpose ==
== Best retro purpose ==
Mid Windows XP era gaming (DirectX 9 for ATI chipsets, DirectX 7-8 for Intel chipset) or as office computer. High resolution display models are not a good choice for a couple of reasons. First, since videocards are not powerful enough for 3D accelerated games in native resolution, performance is lacking. Secondly, the Windows XP GUI looks way too small in native resolution with no magnifying applied and if applied, looks odd due to Windows scaling issues. Moreover, high resolution screens are of the IPS type, using old technology that doesn't refresh fast enough, leaving noticeable trails on fast moving objects. Intel graphics models are cooler running than ATI ones but noticeably slower in 3D games. Windows Vista or 7 runs quite slow, mainly due to the graphics chipset. The safest choice, is a laptop equipped with an 1024x768 screen, preferably with an ATI chipset.
Mid Windows XP era gaming (DirectX 9 for ATI chipsets, DirectX 7-8 for Intel chipset) or as office computer. You shouldn't expect the same flexibility, capability and comfort as on larger 14 or 15inch laptops but if portability is important, this laptop is well suited. It should be noted that the 3D videocard is not very powerful and the CPU is even slower than on a typical T61 laptop so performance is seriously lacking and Windows 7 or Vista is not really suited for such a model.


== Benchmarks ==
== Benchmarks ==


== Durability and Repair-ability ==
== Durability and Repair-ability ==
Good plastic quality means that case cracks are less common than on other models but the model by itself is not immune. Removable and the fixed drive bay are easy to access and the case itself is easy to disassemble due to obvious markings on the laptop's underside as well as masking black tape placed on screws. Many generations (series) of laptops, such as the T60/T61 use the same easy to find screws, trackpads and buttons, keyboards, cooling systems are interchangeable while screens, palmrests, bezels are specific to laptops sizes.
Good plastic quality means that case cracks are less common than on other models but the model by itself is not immune. The fixed drive bay is easy to access and the case itself is easy to disassemble due to obvious markings on the laptop's underside as well as masking black tape placed on screws. Compared with the X61 laptop, the only major drawback is that the CPU is soldered, thus repairs are limited to mostly RAM and disk drive.


The LCD screen's fluorescent backlight is easier to replace since there is plenty of space and a good design on the screen's casing and light dispersion system to accommodate newer and thinner lamps or thicker classic ones. LCD screens can be inter-changed to suit a specific native resolution requirement if the proper original cabling is available. Fans and the fan blades can be easily cleaned and bearings can be easily greased, providing long service life since fan casing stud mountings can be pried open and placed back again.
The LCD screen's fluorescent backlight is not as easy to replace as on the large Thinkpad T61 laptop as the LCD display is a thinner requires more attention during repair and disassembly. The fan is not as easily accessible for cleaning and replacement as on larger Thinkpad T61 models but it is not deliberately designed as such, it is mostly a consequence of compact case requirements.


== Greatest features & flaws ==
== Greatest features & flaws ==
Line 52: Line 54:
! Features !! Flaws  
! Features !! Flaws  
|-
|-
| Good contrast and colour gamut (last 4:3 screen laptops) || Somewhat slow CPU and no CPU upgrade capability
| Good contrast and colour gamut (last 4:3 screen laptops) || Somewhat slow CPU for this laptop class and no CPU upgrade capability
|-
|-
| Thinnest laptop in its class, highly portable || Somewhat cramped keyboard, poor cooling due to the compact design
| Thinnest laptop in its class, highly portable || Somewhat cramped keyboard, poor cooling due to the compact design
|-
|-
| Durable  || No trackpad, no DVI/HDMI output except on docking station   
| Durable construction   || No trackpad, no DVI/HDMI output except on docking station   
|-
|-
| Good, somewhat quiet cooling system || Annoying IBM/Lenovo BIOS limitation of approved Wifi cards
| Adequate cooling system although slightly noisy || Annoying IBM/Lenovo BIOS limitation of approved Wifi cards
|}
|}


== Review ==
== Review ==
A mainstream, quite slim, moderately powerful, business laptop, released in 2006. It had an average mix of performance parts, with a better than average CPU (when using the Core 2 Duo option) but a somewhat lacking graphics module and more fragmentation, due to the similarly equipped Radeon X1300 and X1400 graphics chipsets and the lackluster Intel GPU also available for ordering.  
An ultra compact, very slim, moderately powerful, business laptop, released in 2006. It had a below average mix of performance parts, with a quite slow CPU due to cooling constrains and a somewhat lacking graphics module with no higher powered graphics option than the Intel integrated chipset, creating a relatively lackluster configuration with the only straight advantage of being very portable.  


The platform is centered on Windows XP compatibility, with DDR2 RAM and SATA but not yet a webcam, even if these features were available at that time on other manufacturers' laptops. Overall, there are very small changes between T43 and the previous T60 model in terms of graphics performance although some chassis changes are highly welcome. The trackpad is strongly improved, being more confortable and more reliable due to better buttons and sensitivity. Cooling is the most severe improvement, having an estimated 50-75% improvement in capacity and reduced noise at various fan speeds, mostly due to the requirement of handling faster CPUs. to feel very dated and slightly underpowered.
The platform is centered on Windows XP compatibility, with DDR2 RAM and SATA but not yet a webcam, even if these features were available at that time on other manufacturers' laptops. Overall, there are very small changes between X60 and X61 model in terms of graphics performance although some CPU generational improvements are welcome. The lack of trackpad a noticeable design compromise but the trackpoint is mostly reasonable. Cooling has an annoyingly whiny fan, meaning that you either choose noise or inadequate cooling, there is no in-between choice. The feeling of an under-powered laptop is quite obvious due to CPU frequency and power compromises.


The LCD screen has slightly improved specifications in terms of response time, contrast. Higher resolution models are reasonably close in terms of performance compared with standard resolution ones, limiting the drawbacks compared with the T43 series. The choice of resolution depends mostly on the target OS, with the 1024x768 resolution better suited for Windows XP while the 1400x1050 resolution is better suited for Windows Vista and Seven. The 1600x1200 resolution is suited only for specific use cases. Screens can be easily replaced between similar models but the connector must also be replaced if using different T6x series displays. The widescreen variant is somewhat useless due to the lackluster graphics chipsets available not allowing good enough native resolution performance so they should be avoided. Also, some XP era games might not run or look great on widescreen displays. On the other side, the widescreen model has better audio capabilities due to a different speaker placement, on the top of the chassis, near the screen assembly.
The LCD screen is mostly acceptable but it has lower brightness and contrast compared with a standard 14 inch screen but this was entirely expected when this laptop was available on the market. The 1024x768 resolution screen feels somewhat cramped on a 12 inch screen on Windows XP but feels overly unsuited for Windows Vista and Seven. Another drawback is that the screen itself has quite poor colour gamut, being quite obvious on gradients. Overall, it seems that this laptop was a seriously obvious compromise in terms of quality compared with a standard sized Thinkpad.  


It has a high performance CPU, especially in the Intel Core 2 Duo variant. The Intel Core Duo Cpu is quite a mixed bag as it does not support 64bit operating systems and it is quite slower than the Intel Core 2 Duo CPU, and slightly sluggish in certain cases (lower cache and latency performance). This makes the Core Solo option entirely unacceptable. The Intel video chipset is a very poor option as it does not support Hardware TnL or other capabilities, making it suitable for legacy gaming or application support. The CPU cooling is adequate for all CPU options. Higher performing models with ATI graphics require are only slightly noisier and warmer. The keyboard is quite durable but slightly less stiff and with a noticeable poorer quality feel. The slow decline in build quality becomes obvious on this last fully IBM developed laptop.  
The Intel Core 2 Duo CPU means that running a 64 bit operating system is possible although RAM limitations make less than 4GB to be available on the system so the biggest improvement is in relative performance and better power usage The Intel video chipset is a very poor option as it does not support Hardware TnL or other capabilities, making it suitable for legacy gaming or application support. The CPU cooling is not quite adequate The keyboard is quite durable, comfortable and feels relatively adequate despite the laptop's format constraints.  


The removable drive bay can house an optical drive or a hard drive, if you can find a compatible caddy. The rechargeable battery can be easily removed or replaced. The BIOS and timekeeping battery is a standard CR2032 3V button cell.
The lack of a removable drive bay is not a very major missing feature as most laptops, with the notable exception of Apple ones, did not have an optical drive. The rechargeable battery can be easily removed or replaced. The BIOS and timekeeping battery is a standard CR2032 3V button cell.


The chasis was slightly larger than the T4x series but it is more rounded and even mor comfortable. The laptop's case is slightly less durable than the T4x series, but it holds up well to other durable laptops, while being lighter than the T4x series. The display hinges are overly engineered, with great durability. The integrated speakers are quite good, although their position, size and technology is not the best.
The chassis was slightly smaller than on a X61 laptop but the difference is very minor. The display hinges are overly engineered, with great durability. The integrated speakers are not that great, being very small and placed in the traditional, compromising, downfiring position.


The standard HDDs supplied by Western Digital are reasonably fast and quite silent. The SATA drives offer a good performance boost compared with the T4x series PATA drives, while also supporting exotic, very fast, modern SSDs. No restriction is placed on HDD types. The only compatibility drawback is that only IBM branded or accepted wireless cards can be used.
The standard HDDs supplied by Western Digital are reasonably fast and quite silent. The SATA drives offer a good performance boost compared with the T4x series PATA drives, while also supporting exotic, very fast, modern SSDs. No restriction is placed on HDD types. The only compatibility drawback is that only IBM branded or accepted wireless cards can be used.
Line 79: Line 81:


{{footnotes|
{{footnotes|
# There are no visual clues to differentiate between display types or graphics chipsets based on exterior appearance. However, the 15 inch can be easily noticed as they use a different, thicker, right screen hinge. Models with or without Bluetooth can be spotted if the screen assembly was not changed, due to the well known status bar light on the lower side of the screen.
}}
}}


[[Category:IBM]]
[[Category:IBM]]

Navigation menu