Difference between revisions of "Philips ML"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
129 bytes added ,  15:01, 5 October 2021
m
Line 104: Line 104:


== Manufacturing specificities ==
== Manufacturing specificities ==
Philips has been releasing lamps for many decades. Lamps produced in the 70s and early 80s are probably not commonly found today. In the 90s and early 2000 Philips was manufacturing lamps in Holland and other countries, while in the last years they were doing the same thing in China. Quality was not severely affected as, realistically speaking, there were some occasional lamp defects even in their Holland produced lamps due to average manufacturing quality. It should be noted that mercury vapour lamps were mass manufactured and considered low-cost products, meaning that quality was not paramount.
Philips has been releasing lamps for many decades. Lamps produced in the 70s and early 80s are probably not commonly found today. In the 90s and early 2000 Philips was manufacturing lamps in Holland and other countries, while in the last years they were doing the same thing in China. Quality was severely affected as, realistically speaking, there were some occasional lamp defects even in their Holland produced lamps due to average manufacturing quality. It should be noted that mercury vapour lamps were mass manufactured and considered low-cost products, meaning that quality was not paramount.


Until the manufacturing plants move to China, there were small differences in this product line as the 90s and early 2000s was using the same technology. Chinese built lamps have some slight improvements that leave some aspects to be desired as well. The internal coating is thinner and has a different grain size with a potentially different powder mix, improving colour rendering more than what the datasheet suggests. Lamp lumen maintenance and uniformity is improved due to a thinner coating that degrades slower and more uniformly. However, the lamp light looks whitish-green rather than whitish-purple, which might be unpleasant for some persons.
Until the manufacturing plants move to China, there were small differences in this product line as the 90s and early 2000s was using the same technology. Chinese built lamps have some slight efficiency improvements that trade off on light quality. The internal coating is thinner and has a different grain size with a potentially different powder mix, improving colour rendering more than what the datasheet suggests. However, the light contribution from the internal filament is reduced, reducing consumption but also slightly increasing the perceived light appearance. The colour temperature seems higher and the light has a slightly greenish appearance, making the lamp much less pleasing than competing Osram HWL lamps.
 
Products manufactured by Philips were similar to General Electric but with a quality and consistency much above some East-European manufacturers in terms of colour rendering, light output and life. However, Philips was manufacturing lamps with shorter lifetimes and poorer internal coatings than Osram ones, even if some values specified in datasheets might not suggest much. These differences were maintained until the end of mercury vapour lamp production in the late 2010s. This Philips-Osram lamp difference must be experienced in person. On the other side, Philips lamps were much more popular and are easier to find.  


Lamp lumen maintenance and uniformity is potentially improved due to a thinner coating and less heat being released inside the bulb, reducing coating degradation. However, due to the lamp even higher operating voltage, despite what the datasheet might suggest, the lamp is much quickly rendered useless, potentially prematurely, after only a few thousand hours, with unpleasant endless on-off cycles when powered. This behaviour is very common on the 160W Philips ML lamp as they were considered to be used in less critical installations as the higher rated 250 and 500W lamps. This means that the 160W lamp is clearly a very bad purchase, unless balanced by a very low purchasing cost.
{{footnotes|
{{footnotes|
#  
#  

Navigation menu